Likud Leader: Israeli Courts Corrupted
For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged—Matthew 7:2
New in the Website
Begin's words were the first official acknowledgment by an Israeli Prime Minister that Israeli courts are politically motivated, actively serving the government that pays the Justices' salaries. A few days ago, it was published that settlers gave false testimony to the Supreme Court. The latter accepted an obvious lie as truth, but changed its decision after it was caught red-handed by the lawyers defending the Palestinian owners of the land. Luckily, one doesn't need to trust that writer on this issue. On the same day, January 7, 2013, former candidate to lead Likud, Moshe Feiglin, spoke in the 10th Jerusalem Encounter of B'Sheva, the settler main newspaper; it was later reported by Channel 7 and other Hebrew media. He said, "The people lost trust in the corrupt courts." This was just the beginning of a truly sincere speech.
"They take authority that was not given by the people..."
This long introduction shows that the speaker cannot be easily brushed aside. He knows Israeli reality; this knowledge brought him to say about Israeli courts, "when they take authority that was not given by the people, and then they direct the national agenda, they commit corruption that is worse than financial corruption." He expanded, "More than being worried about the corruption cases recently exposed, I am worried that persons that were not chosen by the people take decisions regarding against whom investigations would be opened and against whom not. In such a way, they own a remote control that allows them to manipulate the state, against the will of its citizens and their elected leaders."
He had no trouble to find a recent example, namely Lieberman's indictment. "After ten years of investigation, charges were placed. When? Two minutes before the elections. The game is political. One of the players took advantage of somebody who got politically hurt [Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister Danny Ayalon] so that he gave testimony. Thus, where is the real corruption? Where is the essential corruption?" Then he added a pivotal point, "We can decide whether to vote for Lieberman or not; in contrast, any attempt to create a public control system [on the court], fails time and again." In other words, the judges are above the law and politically motivated.
"The people have lost trust in judges; a large part of the people do not consider the claims portrayed by judges as moral evidence." In his smart, sharp words, Feiglin failed to match Begin's succinct elegance: "There are judges in Jerusalem."
My articles on the web are my main income these days; please recognize my efforts by donating or buying a copy of The Cross of Bethlehem, or Back in Bethlehem.