Obama Produces Evidence
Everything I did, I did for my country
Pol Pot, "Day of Reckoning" by Nate Thayer, in Far Eastern Economic Review (October 1997)
New in the Website
Common sense still exists in the Kingdom by the Sea.
In contrast to much of the events described in this article, this is a fact acknowledged by the perpetrators themselves. The event transcends the boundaries of War Crimes and can be defined as Crimes against Humanity. It was a literal Holocaust.
Mr Obama, you and your people have no legitimacy to speak about the use of Weapons of Mass Destruction.
You don't have the legitimacy now, and you will not have it in a thousand years from now. You will not have legitimacy even in a million years. May your victims rest in peace.
Paragon of Injustice
For no reason other than its military brutality, the USA had proclaimed itself as having jurisdiction over all other people on this planet. The American endless wars are a horrific evidence of this. Invariably, the USA Government claims to be promoting Democracy and Freedom through the hair-crosses of its weapons of mass destruction. How noble!
Only yesterday, I commented on the dramatic end of a political-terror standoff at the Brazilian Embassy in La Paz. Also in this case, the USA cares neither about freedom nor democracy, but now for the opposite reason: Bolivia is an important unofficial provider of "special sugar." "God bless their crimes!" is the American Administration answer, amid greedy sniffs of the white gold.
Even inwards, the USA doesn't rate as a Democracy; rigged elections+ are just the tip of an ugly iceberg. American justice is based on economic interests, and thus is void of value.
Ev·i·dence [noun] 1: False claim made by a government.
In one of the most shameful moments of the USA, its Secretary of State Colin L. Powell lied to the United Nations during an infamous presentation in February 2003. He offered false audio intercepts, photographs and testimony from anonymous witnesses as proof that Hussein was developing chemical, biological and, perhaps, even nuclear weapons, despite evidence to the contrary offered by U.N. investigators.
One month later, the USA invaded Iraq, backed mainly by the UK.
Soon afterwards, the American lie collapsed. Iraqi weapons of mass destruction were a fairy tale designed to coerce public opinion for the glory of America's oil-interests. Neither Powell nor President Bush had faced international justice for the crime.
British involvement was opposed in Britain, leading to the defeat of the Labor Party and Cameron's victory. Yet, he learned nothing, in 2013, he wants to attack Syria. Let's look at an opposite case.
On December 2011, Israel's Military Intelligence (AMAN) reported that Iran hit an American satellite; shortly after, Iran captured an RQ-170 Sentinel drone, which belongs to the top echelon of American drones. This was acknowledged by the USA, to the extent that President Obama unsuccessfully asked for it to be returned.
These events show that Iran's technological capability allows the capture of a much inferior device like the ScanEagle, a low-cost, short-range unmanned aircraft made by Boeing.
A spokesman for the US Fifth Fleet based in the Gulf claimed on the same reports that none of its drones was missing. Shortly after, one of the White House spokesmen said, "there is no evidence" that the Iranian claim was true. Turning around slowly, the camera showed the public. Most reporters were unable to disguise their disbelief.
Come on, mighty America, first you violate humanity, and then you insult its intelligence? That's not nice! Iran had more evidence on your drones than you ever had on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction!
The American Government claims that whatever it says is true, despite evidence showing the opposite. On the other hand, it claims that proper evidence presented by other parties is false. This is called demagogy.
A few days ago, I reported an American Attack on Syria Announced by Israel. Israel is pushing around propaganda claiming that Syria had used chemical weapons.
Yet it is against British common sense that Syria would behave like that, after all, then they would became a legitimate military target of the West. Why would Bashar al-Assad give legitimacy to terror?
The most probable perpetrators are the Israel- and USA-backed mercenaries attacking Syria in an attempt to provide an excuse for the West to attack directly. USA and Israel had failed to provide evidence that this is not the case. On the contrary, all evidence shows that the USA is trying to force an excuse for yet another illegitimate attack on humanity.
Mr. Obama, as stated before, you should be very quiet on the topic of weapons of mass destruction.
Mr. Obama, you have no right to impose your rigged democracy on others.
Mr. Obama, you have no right to impose your vicious violence, void values, and crooked laws on others.
Especially so, when the only way you know how to achieve that is brute force, threat, and lies.
Your conscience may be clear—if you worship a false idol—but your hands are stained with the crying blood of innocents.
* For the very strange reaction of the Hebrew settlements in Palestine at the time and the very complex relations between Israel and Japan, see Japan Demands Explanations from Israel on Facebook Attack.
** For the USA minerals war in Afghanistan see the Rare Earth Wars section.
+ Does the USA keep the Separation of Powers that is essential to the proper function of a state? The very obvious classification of American judges upon partisan lines tells us that not. The American judiciary system is an extension of its political system and subordinated to it; its judges have been degraded to mere politruks—Soviet political officers—cleansing society from undesired opinions.
My articles on the web are my main income these days; please donate or buy The Cross of Bethlehem or Back in Bethlehem.