Israel Assassinates the "Freelancer of Terror"
Shin Beth and IDF Terminated the Freelancer of Terror
Yedioth Ahronot, April 30, 2013
New in the Website
Only yesterday, I commented on the Israeli saying "The Jewish Brain Invents Patents," in the context of a new semantic invention promoting war ("entwined red lines"). The saying denotes a wild act, a purposeful violation of the law, usually by the government. A few hours later, Israel assassinated Hitham Mishal (pronounced "Miskhal") in the Shati refugees' camp in Gaza. The headlines of Yedioth Ahronot, the largest paid Hebrew newspaper, claimed "Shin Beth and IDF Terminated the Freelancer of Terror." The Jewish brain had invented a new term: "Freelance Terror."
"'Kidnapped Soldiers' blared the Israeli headlines in 2006, after a soldier was captured in Gaza and two in Southern Lebanon. I was surprised. Since when is a soldier 'kidnapped?' Were they watering their mothers' gardens at the time? No, they were participating in military events. Soldiers are never kidnapped; they are captured. Afterwards, they should be treated according to the international Geneva Convention. That one simple semantic deceit by the Israeli media kidnapped the nation's mind," that's the beginning of An Eye for an Eye: On War Semantics, which analyzed the false reasoning of Israel for the beginning of the 2006 War with Hezbollah. After all, Jewish brains aren't so innovative; "Kidnapped Soldiers" is pretty much the same as "Freelance Terror." Let's take a look.
Israel Never Assassinates!
Let me cut short Mr. ben Yishai and Shin Beth's delusions. I am not saying that Mr. Mishal was innocent, I don't know. Nobody knows, so we should assume he is innocent; this is the basis of a proper legal system. No country can declare war against individuals, not even the USA. No country can deny a suspect a fair chance to defend himself in a legitimate court. Given the circumstances, the partial Israeli military and civilian courts can not enter this category. No punishment can be administered for unproven crimes and allegations. If I claim that Mr. Netanyahu is responsible for the 9/11 crimes, this cannot be used for "focused foiling." The same goes for any similar claim by ben Yishai, or his Shin Beth bosses. If you behave like that, you render Israel as a terror state.
Mr. Mishal wasn't a "Freelance Terrorist" anymore than the Israeli soldiers had been "kidnapped." This is Israeli manipulation in the best style of Orwell's 1984. Does anybody in Israel think that Mishal would have worked for Israel for money? Take your time, Mr. ben Yishai, let your Jewish brain invent yet another patent, one that wouldn't be such a transparent lie.
Ben Yishai, one last issue. I understand your concern for human life. After all, during your mid-year terror festival your leaders like to remind "every soul is worth an entire world." That's why you called Mishal a "terrorist" after accusing him without proofs of killing innocents. If we accept that, and we assume that you are an honest person, then the same applies to Jews assassinating innocents. Mr. ben Yishai, you have awesome connections. Do you know Jonatan Caspi? Do you know Jonatan Goldman? Do you know Izhak Banderovitz? Finally, Do you know Jonatan Glikman?
This is not fair, I tricked you and didn't give you a chance to defend yourself. Let me help you. The four gentlemen are the same person. He blew up the King David Hotel in 1946. This was the bloodiest ever terror act in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Is he a terrorist as Mishal, or you would define the one as a "freedom fighter" and the second as a "freelance terrorist?" Again I am not being fair; you, Mr. Honesty, are in the State payroll and will defend Netanyahu's choice of a scapegoat down to the "focused foiling" of others.
* Doublethink "The keyword here is blackwhite. Like so many Newspeak words, this word has two mutually contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts. Applied to a Party member, it means a loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary. This demands a continuous alteration of the past, made possible by the system of thought which really embraces all the rest, and which is known in Newspeak as doublethink. Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." George Orwell, 1984
My articles on the web are my main income these days; please donate or buy The Cross of Bethlehem or Back in Bethlehem.