Home | Goodies | The Cross of Bethlehem | New!Back in Bethlehem | Donations
| | ROI TOV
Introduction

The Cross of Bethlehem

The Cross of Bethlehem II

Arab Justice Rejects Israeli Anthem

Justice Salim Joubran refuses to sing Hatikva during Supreme Court’s Presidential Exchange

 

 

New in the Website


Large Coffee Animation

Israel, Israel über alles, | Israel, Israel above everything,
Über alles in der Welt, | Above everything in the world,

This is not Israel’s anthem, but a paraphrase on the German one; I replaced “Deutschland” with “Israel.” While preparing this article, it was impossible to ignore these two lines from the German national anthem, the Deutschlandlied. Israel’s anthem—“Hatikva,” “The Hope”—is not less problematic: “A Jewish soul still yearns,” it says among other problematic words; it also fails to mention anyone but Jews. Accordingly, Israel’s only Arab Justice—Salim Jubran—refused to sing it when the Presidents of the Supreme Court were exchanged on February 28, 2012.

Israel’s Supreme Court

Israel’s Supreme Court

 

 

Netanyahu Bought Justice

 

On, December 12, 2011, Netanyahu’s coalition withdrew from the Knesset what is known as the Grunis Law, named after Justice Asher Dan Grunis. This was a personal law legislated specifically to allow Mr. Grunis to become President of Israel’s Supreme Court (see Netanyahu buys Justice). Back then, Netanyahu was under pressure. In February 2012, Dorit Beinisch, the former president, was to retire since Justices in Israel retire at the age of 70. Among all candidates—the remaining 13—Asher Dan Grunis was the one favored by Netanyahu to become the next president. Grunis is a descendant of Rabbi Yitzhak Meir Alter, founder of the Gur Hassidic movement. As such, he is the closest existing candidate to the right-wing, Pharisaic ideology favored by Netanyahu’s coalition. Unluckily, another right-wing government sabotaged this already in July 2007, when it promoted an amendment to the Israel Courts Law stating that a Justice with less than three years of service left would not be eligible as president. On the day the former president left office, Mr. Grunis was 41 days short of this limitation. Hence, he could not be elected. Netanyahu tried to rush the Grunis Law through the Knesset, so that his favored Justice would become president. The opposition placed 5000 objections in the way of the new law. Consequently, it was withdrawn. However, following a tortuous legislative path, it was eventually approved, and yesterday, Justice Grunis was sworn in as President of Israel’s Supreme Court of Justice.

The importance of this appointment became clear a few days ago, when under the leadership of the former president—Justice Dorit Beinisch—the court nullified the Tal Law. This law allows ultra-Orthodox Jews (Haredim and Hasidim) to choose whether or not to serve in the IDF. For other Israelis service in the IDF is mandatory. Most of them decline. The new president of the court opposed the nullification of the law. He declared he doesn’t believe the court should intervene in this case. Now that he became president of the court he acquired more power to influence whatever decision would be taken in the following months. If no new law is legislated, the Haredim will have to serve in the army. Netanyahu’s coalitional government depends on the Haredim; thus, he must keep them out of the army. He may need for that the support of the Supreme Court. Netanyahu’s acquisition of a Justice—the President of the Supreme Court no less—will pay off quickly.

 

Israel’s Discriminatory Gavel

Supreme Court of Justice | Israel’s Discriminatory Gavel

 

 

Israel’s Supreme Court Discriminates

 

The silent protest of Justice Salim Jubran during the ceremony may seem exaggerated. After all, he is from a Christian Arab family descended from Lebanese Maronites and serves in the highest Israeli court. He is in charge of applying justice and making sure there is no discrimination. Yet, Israel’s Supreme court has a disturbing history of discrimination against non-Jews.

The seat of Justice Jubran himself is a testimony of that. He is the first Arab to receive a permanent appointment in the Supreme Court, and the second Arab judge to hold a Supreme Court appointment. He was preceded by Abdel Rahman Zuabi, who held a fixed nine month appointment in 1999. That is for a minority of over 20% of the country’s population!

Another good example of discrimination is the “Citizenship Law (Temporary Order)” of the State of Israel, which dates in its actual version back to September 2005. From the days of its previous version (2003) it is approved temporarily by the Israeli government every year. In 2006, five judges of the High Court of Justice stated that the law contravened the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Freedom and that it must be removed from the law books. Yet, it has been extended in an extra-parliamentary fashion every year since then.

It doesn’t override the “Law of Return,” a racist monster giving automatic citizenship to every Jew arriving in Israel (the question “Who is a Jew?” was never answered by the Knesset, the Israeli Parliament), thus this law is aimed mainly at regulating the status of non-Jews requesting Israeli citizenship; it specifically discriminates Arabs. To be clear, that means Palestinians asking for citizenship after having married an Israeli citizen. It stipulates that the Minister of Interior does not have authority to approve Israeli residence for a resident of Judea and Samaria (unless they are Jewish settlers!). This is so even regarding marriage, when it comes to Palestinian spouses who are younger than 35 (men) or 25 (women). The law prevents young Israeli citizens (supposedly Palestinians) from marrying the spouse of their choice and living in Israel, if the latter is a Palestinian from Judea and Samaria.

In March 2010, the Citizenship Law was being questioned in the Israeli Supreme Court on the grounds of being discriminatory. Justice Rubinstein (the publication of official documents proving his corruption was suppressed by the Israeli media in 2005) claimed that there is no country in the situation of Israel and thus the law is justified. The president of the court at the time, Dorit Beinish, supported this odd claim. Accordingly, since it was amended in 2005, 632 requests of citizenship were rejected by the state, on the grounds that the petitioners may use their new status to become terrorists with easier access to Israel. 632 Broken families; 1264 new testimonies of Israel’s inhumanity and an unknown number of children that will not be born.

Justice Salim Jubran

Justice Salim Jubran

Israel is a small country. Only days ago I commented in USA Denies Visa to Jewish Knesset Member on Knesset Member Michael Ben Ari. Now, he was among the first to react to Justice Jubran’s justified protest. He condemned Justice Jubran and announced that he will submit on February 29, the “Jubran Bill,” which will stipulate that a person who did not serve his country, be it in the IDF or through national or civil service, will not be permitted to serve as a judge in the Supreme Court and, if already appointed, will not be allowed to serve as its president or vice president. “Every Israeli citizen is committed to the anthem, and certainly those who hold senior state positions,” said Ben-Ari. “The fact that Jubran did not hesitate to degrade the state ceremony of the changing of the presidents is like spitting in the face of Israel. There are citizens who demand rights and government positions, but who scorn their national obligations with insolence and arrogance. This situation endangers the existence of the state and must be eradicated,” he added.

 

Member of the Knesset Ben Ari, isn’t the insolence yours? Aren’t you degrading humanity? Who gave you the right to define Israel as an ethnic or religious state? Israeli citizens never had a say in this. The UN stipulated clear conditions to avoid that when it allowed Israel to declare independence (see Is Israel Sovereign?; specifically the parallel independence of Palestine and respecting human rights). Justice Grunis and MK Ben Ari, can you—please—tell me who gave the Israeli Administration the right to define a racist national anthem? Who gave you the right to decide who will marry whom? Who gave you the right to favor Haredim and discriminate against all others? We say a loud and clear “No!” to you and all institutions promoting your racist policies. Never again!*

* - “Never Again!” is a popular slogan of the Zionists when talking about Nazi Germany.

 

Addendum: HaTikva Words

 

Judge by yourself, can a non-Jewish citizen of Israel identify himself—or herself—with the following words?:

As long as in the heart, within, | Kol ‘od balevav pnima
A Jewish soul still yearns, | Nefesh yehudi homiyah,
And onward, towards the ends of the east, | Ulefa’atei mizrach kadimah,
An eye still gazes toward Zion; | ‘Ayin letziyon tzofiyah;

Our hope is not yet lost, | ‘Od lo avdah tikvateinu,
The hope of two thousand years, | Hatikvah bat shnot alpayim,
To be a free people in our land, | Lihiyot ‘am hofshi be’artzeinu,
The land of Zion and Jerusalem. | Eretz-tziyon (v)Yerushalayim.

+
+ +

Go Top
Subscribe to Roi Tov Bookmark and Share Email

 

Poisoned by Bolivia
KIDNAPPED BY BOLIVIA!—I am being tortured by the Bolivian Government

I have been declared a Political Prisoner of Bolivia, a country which does not respect human life. I am held in Bolivia illegitimately, violently and against my will. I am violated daily; please make this public in any possible way. Before writing to me, please read 15-Day Execution Order and the Bolivia section of the website.

Please buy something from Amazon by clicking on any of the links below. It can be different items.

Kindle
Kindle

 

My articles on the web are my main income these days; please donate or buy The Cross of Bethlehem or Back in Bethlehem.

 

All texts and background photo © Roi Tov 2004—2014 tovroy@aol.com

שחסד ישוע המשיח אהבת האל וחברת רוח הקודש יהיו עם כולכם